03

　　關(guān)于其他試驗對象

　　He said during the panel discussion that his team enrolled a total of 8 voluntary couples, one of them dropped out. The team collected 30 eggs, which developed into an embryo and 70 percent of them were edited.

　　在回顧實驗安排時，賀建奎說他的團隊最初招募了8對夫妻，但其中一對中途退出試驗。剩下的七對夫妻提供的受精卵中，有30個成功發(fā)展成胚胎，實驗團隊為其中的70%實施了基因編輯。

　　He Jiankui said there is another potential pregnancy with genome editing in his clinical trials besides Lulu and Nana. He said the pregnancy is still in early stage, a chemical pregnancy.

　　賀建奎透露，除了露露和娜娜之外，目前志愿者中還有另外一個潛在的懷孕案例，不過還處于非常早的階段，而且是流產(chǎn)率很高的化學妊娠。

　　04

　　關(guān)于秘密試驗

　　In response to why his experiment was kept in secret, He Jiankui said that he has engaged the international scientists two years ago, and he explained his experiment in international conferences and received feedback.

　　面對為何一直將實驗保密的質(zhì)疑，賀建奎解釋說自己2017年在冷泉港和伯克利基因編輯研討會就展示過一些數(shù)據(jù)，跟國際專家探討過有關(guān)問題，收到了很有建設性的意見。倫理方面，賀建奎說自己也咨詢過斯坦福和哈佛的頂尖倫理學家，并在臨床試驗開始時將草擬的知情同意書交給一位美國的教授審閱。

　　05

　　關(guān)于責任承擔

　　He said that there are millions of families with inherited diseases or exposure to infectious disease. If we have the technology and can make it available, then this will help people. When we talk about the future, it is up to society to decide what to do next.

　　當被問到自己如何理解自己對露露和娜娜的責任時，賀建奎說成千上萬的家庭正在遭受遺傳病的侵擾，如果我們有這個技術(shù)就應該用它去幫助別人。如果說要談未來的話，應該是這個社會一起決定下一步要怎么做。

　　06

　　關(guān)于自己孩子的假設

　　“That's a good question. If it was my baby, with the same situation, yes I would try first.”

　　在被問到是否會在自己的小孩身上開展實驗時，賀建奎說如果他自己的孩子也在相同的(艾滋病)的處境，他會第一個開展實驗。

　　(圖via網(wǎng)絡)

　　雖然賀建奎本人在論壇上做了一些解釋，但與會的其他專家學者依然表達了對這一試驗的不贊同……

　　Professor Robin Lovell-Badge, who joined the panel session with He, said he believed that what He did was wrong. He should publish his work and data for the experiment and involve authorities.

　　倫敦弗朗西斯•克里克研究所的遺傳學和胚胎學教授羅賓洛·弗爾-巴奇結(jié)束了跟賀建奎的座談會之后對記者說，他仍然認為賀建奎的做法是錯的，他應該公開發(fā)表試驗數(shù)據(jù)和信息，并通知相關(guān)部門。

　　The professor said it's important to keep the babies confidential, and it was not a breakthrough but rather a step backwards for the industry.

　　羅賓教授認為露露和娜娜的信息應該被嚴格保密，并認為本次試驗并不是基因編輯科學的一次突破而是倒退。

　　David Baltimore, chairman of the organizing committee, said that the committee may issue a statement Thursday on He's experiment, and He’s experiment is irresponsible.

　　戴維·巴爾的摩，本次峰會的組委會主席，告訴記者組委會可能會在周四就賀建奎的試驗發(fā)布一則聲明，他強調(diào)賀建奎的試驗是不負責任的行為，是在缺乏透明度的情況下，科學界自律失敗的表現(xiàn)。

　　(圖via網(wǎng)絡)